home

Meetings Reports

20 February 2008                report by Ian Abbott

"Faith schools should form no part of the state education system"

There was certainly a god-shaped-hole in Churchtown on Wednesday evening (20th February).

 

Lancashire Secular Humanists were entertained by a well informed and skilfully argued presentation entitled ‘Faith Schools should form no part of the state education system’ delivered by the British Humanist Associations education officer Andrew Copson at Kirkland & Catterall Community Hall.

 

Despite the fact that Lancashire has more faith schools than any other region of England & Wales and, having invited a large number of religious and faith school representatives to engage Andrew in what was always planned to be an open debate in a public forum chaired by a neutral education professional, the very people who claim such ‘sectarian schools’ somehow benefit rather than segregate society were glaringly conspicuous by their absence.

 

Fortunately Andrew was well versed in the various arguments frequently put forward in defence of maintaining (and increasing ) the number of faith schools and so, playing both parts, he firstly put the case on behalf of the defence before comprehensively rebutting each ‘reason’ point by point.

 

After speaking Andrew took questions from the floor and was inundated with a stream of comments, questions, and suggestions from an equally articulate audience and the evening evolved into a well mannered but nevertheless lively and agreeable debate.

 

Sadly, having run out of time, the chairman was compelled to bring the evening to an end by thanking Andrew, who was warmly applauded by an appreciative audience.

 

 

 

 

 

Dignity in Dying              16 January 2008                  report by Ian Abbott

 

"I helped my son to end his life" … a revelation which left the audience at the Lancashire Secular Humanists meeting temporarily speechless as they absorbed the immense courage and compassion demonstrated by Heather, who accompanied Susie Vane-Tempest of Dignity in Dying (DiD), when they addressed the LSH meeting at Great Eccleston Village Centre last Wednesday evening (16th January).

Heather (also a member of DiD) told of how two of her five children had inherited Huntington's Disease.

One son, a gifted artist, had made the decision to end his life once his condition had deteriorated to such an extent that not only was he no longer able to paint but was finding it almost impossible to care for himself; even though, despite continuing unpreventable deterioration, he would in all probability survive another five to eight years.

He was a man who valued greatly his independence and abhorred the very idea that 24 hour nursing care was ultimately inevitable; consequently he had been discussing his decision to end his life (at a time of his choosing) with his loving family over a period of two years and on the occasion of his last birthday he informed his mother that this was the day he had chosen to die.

He told her he had persuaded friends to supply him with the only birthday present he truly wanted – heroin- so as to end his life, and that he’d taken an overdose (which he eventually resorted to swallowing due to the fact that, despite many attempts, his condition made it impossible for him to inject) and that even though he had no wish to die alone he would fully understand if she did not want to stay. But; if she did stay, she had to promise that she would not allow his suicide to be unsuccessful.

Of course she wasn’t going to leave him alone! Heather made him comfortable then lay down on the bed beside him and they talked about all he had done in his life, the happy family times they’d enjoyed and all the other things their family will never forget; and continued talking until he fell asleep.

Heather fell asleep herself and when she woke his breathing was erratic and shallow; his face was white, his lips blue … but he was still alive. She took a pillow and placed it over his face until she was certain he was dead, and then phoned the police and an ambulance.

She never attempted to deny, or in any way mitigate, what she had done but at her trial, forensic experts on both side concurred that it was his overdose that killed him and therefore her actions could not be construed as murder or manslaughter; however she was convicted, on her own admission, of assisting in his suicide.

Her story was truly moving and there were more than a few tears shed in the audience as her story unfolded.

Emotions were mixed between admiring her undeniable and unwavering love for her son; but tinged with outrage that the law in this country is such that both he and she had been forced into such a situation; and that Heather herself should then be branded a criminal having acted entirely out of love for him, respect for his wishes and compassion for his predicament.

Heather went on to explain how another son, also with Huntington's Disease, is an entirely different character.

He has no desire to end his life prematurely. A decision that is absolutely respected by all his loving family who will continue to do all they can to make his life as rich and fulfilling as possible until his inevitable death.

Susie Vane-Tempest explained how, despite DiD’s support, The Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill (ADTI) Bill was narrowly defeated last year, almost entirely due to the Bench of Bishops turning out in force and voting in unison; despite the fact that every opinion poll in recent years consistently indicates that 80% of the population agree that *mentally competent, terminally ill people with six months or less to live who make persistent, well informed, voluntary requests and are suffering unbearably should be able to choose to receive medical help to die*. [*The entire scope of the Bill*] Interestingly 81% of those who describe themselves as Anglicans and Catholics support that wording; which begs the question; who are the Bench of Bishops supposed to be representing?

Susie described how, in addition to the narrow parameters of who should have access to ADTI (if they so choose) there are over 20 safeguards built in to the Bill to protect the vulnerable.

She then informed her audience about Living Wills and various other assistance and advice that DiD can supply.

Suzie & Heather waived any travel expenses LSH were planning to give them asking instead for that money to be sent to DiD; with that the audience held a collection which was added to the LSH cheque and forwarded to DiD HQ.

Anybody seeking further information can access it a www.dignityindying.org.uk … or via LSH’s own website www.lancashiresecularhumanists.co.uk or come to future LSH meetings and pick up DiD literature there.

 

Inaugural Meeting              12 Sept 2007                     report by Ian Abbott

A flock of Humanists descended on Great Eccleston on Wednesday night!

The inaugural meeting of Lancashire Secular Humanists was a great success.

The meeting was opened by Ian Abbott who explained that the primary aims of this meeting were two-fold.

On the one hand it was intended as a dry-run to identify any glitches that may occur when our meetings begin in earnest in January 2008; and on the other, it was to give people an opportunity to come along, have a look at us, see what we’re all about and maybe take away any literature they wanted.

People there had travelled from as far afield as Clitheroe and were pleased to be given the opportunity to meet with so many other like-minded people from around the county who had come to listen to Television Screenwriter and University lecturer Bill Dawson; a Humanist Celebrant accredited by The British Humanist Association.

So many people attended that the extremely helpful staff at the new Great Eccleston Village Centre went to great lengths to help the meeting move into a much larger room just to accommodate the numbers.

And all those who attended agreed that the journey was well worth the effort.

Bill entertained his audience with stories about how, many years ago, he had attended the very disappointing church funeral of his Uncle Billy in Liverpool and came away convinced that he couldn’t possibly do it any worse and feeling that he could probably do it infinitely better.

He described how he made contact with The British Humanist Association and was accepted by them for training in Humanist ceremonies and then talked about the huge variety of ceremonies he has conducted.

There were stories both tragic and humorous about some of the predicaments he’d encountered including his own, real life version of the Dead Parrot Sketch.

He talked about his own (recent) very moving Humanist Wedding ceremony and of some of the wonderful people whose weddings he has been privileged to have officiated at, and some of the strange and unusual locations where they have taken place.

And Bill’s genuine enjoyment in conducting Baby-Naming ceremonies was obvious for all to see.

Everybody present had the opportunity to throw questions at Bill about Ceremonies in particular and Humanism in general and, at the end of the evening he was roundly applauded by a very appreciative audience.

Forthcoming events already planned will include

Dignity in Dying … putting the case for elected medically assisted death... and no doubt including information about 'Living Wills'.

‘Faith schools should form no part of the state education system’. Andrew Copson (BHA Education Officer) will be leading a debate.

How the Chaplaincy Services in The Health Service, Palliative Care, Universities, Prisons, and The Armed Forces; are failing to address the needs of those who are not religious.

R.E. in Schools … many year six Junior School pupils having found out which High School they have got into will want to know where they stand on issues such as R.E.; Collective Worship Assemblies, Home to School Transport etc. Particularly if they have concerns about being allocated a Church school simply because it's their nearest school.

On the whole the meeting proved invaluable; certainly with regards to our first aim … identifying glitches.

We were able to speak with the Village Centre staff and revise the procedures for future meetings.

They were surprised by how many people had turned up and had some concerns about how smoothly the changeover would be given that the earlier occupants of ‘our’ room would be leaving when such a large number of ‘us’ were arriving.

We decided that, for future meetings, we would assemble in the coffee lounge from 7:30, greet & meet each other as people arrived and have our coffee / tea & biscuits then - before getting underway with the planned event.

We could also use that time to share any housekeeping notices, news and messages with the attendees; thereby giving the Village Centre Staff time to prepare the room for us before we make our way up to begin at 8pm.

As to how successful our second aim was … ‘to give people an opportunity to come along, have a look at us, see what we’re all about and maybe take away any literature they wanted’ … that is perhaps a little more difficult to judge. Certainly a lot of people attended, and those who did were very enthusiastic. A great deal of literature was taken away and many questions were answered [And the ten ‘canvass’ BHA shopping bags disappeared very quickly] so, in that respect it was without doubt a success; but I suppose the proof of the pudding will be in the eating.

Hopefully this encouraging start augurs well for the future but for our group to thrive make a difference we will have to make sure the events and speakers are pertinent and interesting; and that every new-face is made to feel welcome and valued.

Bill Dawson made an excellent point when he reminded us all that there is no hierarchy in humanism; just because some members have been attending meetings for many years, and some of them have been pressed into holding offices, that doesn’t make the views of others any less valuable. In fact, it could be argued that it makes their views all the more valuable; because newcomers should question why things are done in the way they are … and that’s a question that is always worth asking.

One thing that was revealed by this inaugural meeting was how under-represented young people are. That is something that needs to be given some thought.

 

 

 

 

home